A mod banned me from a busty subreddit claiming I was flat as a board and had no tits. LOL. 🌟 Tip $5 if you think that mod be trippin’ and that my tits are OP and straight 🔥 💕 I’m working my way through customs and I appreciate all your patience. Feel free to message me if you want to have some Intellectual discussions or need an emotional outlet. 🥰
2021-10-27 18:07:14 +0000 UTC View Post
🌟 What kind of topics are you interested in reading about? If you would like to be specific, what type of questions do you find most interesting to think about? Would love to hear your thoughts in the comments section! ❤️
2021-10-26 15:28:00 +0000 UTC View Post
My main limitation is my emotions (or lack thereof except for sadness and feelings of inadequacy). My emotional limitations, in the sense that they are tied almost inextricably to whether I can rationally justify them. It’s difficult for me to feel “happy” if there are no “happy circumstances” (or a circumstance that rationally warrants happiness such as winning a lot of money or an academic achievement) in which I can attribute that emotion to. I do feel a lot of sadness and depression, which I, unfortunately, tell myself is justified because of the decisions that got me to this point (choosing the wrong field - philosophy), not choosing a career that would have actually granted me the much needed independence in my life, and simply not being “good enough” to have prevented that mistake. I suppose, the insecurity of not “being enough” is the biggest limitation in my life. With my mention of philosophy: I am in awe at the philosophers I study and have studied under — such as Kripke, Fitting, Freeman, Devitt, etc. They are brilliant, original, and have contributed groundbreaking work in the field. I don’t think my mind was fit to study logic and maths. It was actually very difficult for me to get through the higher level maths, even though I enjoyed it very much. I couldn’t finish my minor and had to take my minor in French, instead. I felt that by pursuing philosophy, I was, indeed, “following my dreams”, but at what cost? I wasn’t being realistic — I didn’t think concretely about my future and how much money I would have to fork out for this graduate degree — or how it is nearly impossible to gain tenure in my case, how many “original” publications you have to push out into prestigious academic journals a year, how little time you have between research, writing, teaching, and the fact that I am socially inept which should have been a sign that I wouldn’t have made a great teacher in the first place. I never considered myself to be intellectually gifted; I always felt that most of my academic and intellectual merits resulted from me working extraordinarily hard to appease my parents who have come to hold low standards for me, relative to my sister (who they expect big things from). I think about this a lot, actually. With a career, my main problem is that I feel limited by what I believe to be realistic and rational (such as my belief that I shouldn’t pursue certain things because I’m not good enough). I don’t want to be guided by my “deceptive emotions” — but that thought itself isn’t rational. To escape this limiting belief, I must acknowledge that my motivations, desires, belief systems, basically: the framework in which I perceive myself as an individual tied to a variety of identities (group affiliation, roles I play under various conditions) and relationships are the result of u n.c o n s c i o u s mental processes, many that are not easily accessible to the so-called “rational mind”. In the end, my belief that I’m not good enough to be a philosopher: I “rationally” believe that I should be realistic with what I am capable of, what my talents are, and I should be honest with who I am. (for example, I have hand tremors so there is no way I can be a surgeon of any kind or work with my hands — that would be unrealistic — anyone who would support me if that was my “passion” or “dream” would be lying and doing me a disservice because I have physical restraints). I want to know I am not pursuing something based off raw passion, and that I actually excel in this field. To be true to myself, is to 1) be honest about your intellectual and physical limitations (people are good at different things, people have limitations that prevent them from doing what they truly want to do — like I said, I have tremors that makes me physically incapable of doing certain things with my hands. It would be disingenuous for me to choose a career path that warrants absolute precision) 2) this is what I fail at: to be honest about what you ARE capable of, to understand that one instance of failure (er few instances of failures) is not sufficient evidence for you to neglect your would-be potential and cease trying altogether. I view this as a precarious balance between being realistic to what you know (which includes what you do not know such as your own potential) and the acknowledgement that you do not have an objective or all encompassing perspective of yourself and the world — our view of the world and our role in it is inevitably filtered by insecurities, biases, inexplicable beliefs and thoughts that ultimately guide our underlying brain processes (which as I said previously, is not rational).
2021-10-26 00:43:56 +0000 UTC View Post
Photos taken in Paris, France. 🌟 What do you dislike in an OnlyFans Page? What makes you not rebill into the next month? Describe your expectations and experiences in the comment section below if you can.
2021-10-25 18:30:17 +0000 UTC View Post
Selfies I took today for you all. 🥰💕 🌟 Another poll: How many paid Onlyfans Subscriptions do you have? Answer in the comments what features you look for most in a subscription!
2021-10-24 23:46:21 +0000 UTC View Post
🌟 Tip if you think i'm a good little Asian cocksucker. >:) 🔥 Tips are not necessary, but if you have the means to comfortably do so, it is very much appreciated it; it helps me increase the production value and helps me financially compensate women I feature on my page for GG content. 💕 I went through a decent amount of customs this weekend, but have a bit more to go. I feel I will have them completed by next week. I will try to regularly send stuff through your dms to compensate for the delay. I appreciate your patience. I didn't forget about any of you. :-)
2021-10-24 11:30:08 +0000 UTC View Post
My OP tits and memories from when my snap game was 🔥🔥 🌟 On the evolution of morality Yesterday, a friend made the claim that there is no such thing as morality and that good & bad are simply human social constructions. Moral relativism instinctively puts a bad taste in my mouth as it is a lazy explanation that doesn’t say anything new about what it purports to explain. Even if I knew it was incorrect, I had a difficult time refuting it. Then I thought about morality in terms of the behavior of primates. Our non human ancestors (primates) have a system of morality if we think of it as a code of conduct. They can understand the concept of “fairness” hence being ripped off will cause them to be angry. Maybe morality can be reduced to what is evolutionarily advantageous, and as animals develop in intellect, they gain greater capacity to understand morality. I say this because species that are less evolved such as certain breeds of birds will often not act in their best interest (such as by killing their offspring which is maladaptive.) Unfortunately it is difficult to prove morality isn’t a social construct conjured by humans as a method of behavioral regulation and that there is indeed “objective” concepts of morality that exist in the world. As previously stated, I believe that a species’ understanding of morality increases alongside the progress of their evolution — perhaps they coevolved (the development of certain brain functions). I recently read a book that talks about just this titled Primates and Philosophy: How Morality Evolved where Frans de Waal demonstrate precursors to what we would consider “morality”. In Primates and Philosophers, Frans De Waal attempts to analyze the origins of human morality through what we would perceive as moral behavior in our non-human ancestors, chimpanzees and other primates. Evolution is selfish, it causes individuals to take whatever actions that is conducive to their survival and reproduction.
2021-10-23 21:24:43 +0000 UTC View PostThis is a brief sample of the video customs I mentioned earlier today featuring race play. 🌟 For $20, I’ll make a 5 minute video personally addressed to you, say your name as much as you want, basically tell you how much I want your cock, and all that dirty talk. I can include race play (which I love to do, as well 😉). Note: The reason the masturbation video customs take forever is because I don’t fake my orgasms and I cant orgasm multiple times a day. I will hopefully be getting through the customs this weekend! I didn’t forget about anyone. I documented all the customs on a list.
2021-10-23 03:15:16 +0000 UTC View Post
These are photos I took in Prague, Czech Republic. The architecture was vivid and colorful. Also included are photos of me from when I visited California. 😇
2021-10-23 02:04:44 +0000 UTC View Post
For a short time, I’m offering a personalized nude video where I say your name (I can repeat it as much as you want) and tell you in detail what I want to do to your cock. I can be as filthy as you’d like. I’d love to just make something that makes you hard af. 😉 Minor easily made adjustments can be specified such as stripping in the beginning or certain outfits / lingerie. 🌟 $10 — 2 to 3 min Audio Clip 🌟 $20 — 3-5 min Video Add self-humiliation and self-degradation + 10 Fem Dom version +5 Unlike other customs which tend to take longer, these videos and cock ratings can usually be done either that same day or the next one. 🌟 Tip to show love and appreciation for my efforts 💕 I hope they have not been wasted.
2021-10-22 18:49:41 +0000 UTC View Post
Photos from when I drove across country all the way to Chicago. 🔥 How are you guys today? Have any fun plans for the weekend? 🥰 🌟 And here’s an essay on Definite Descriptions. I try to write in a way where anyone even without a background in philosophy can come to understand what I write: According to Bertrand Russell, definite descriptions do not function the same way as proper names; instead, definite descriptions act as quantifiers (i.e: words like some, few, all, etc). An example of an indefinite description is “A king of France” which could potentially point out many objects who fall under the common domain of “kings of France” or “A F”; indefinite descriptions do not name particular objects but only refer to concepts. A definite description is an expression that picks out a particular unique object, namely “The present king of France” or “The F”. Because definite descriptions sometimes fail to denote or refer to an object (it sometimes fails to have an instance, for example: nonexistent objects which do not have a referent), therefore, definite descriptions cannot function like a proper name because proper names should designate a particular object who is named; instead, definite descriptions act as existential quantifiers. The statement “the present king of France is bald” is , for Russell, a false statement; I agree with Strawson’s argument that the expression, because it has no valid referent, should be neither true nor false. The present king of France does not exist therefore he cannot be bald or not bald. The question that Russell proposes regarding “The present king of France is bald” is how can a clearly false statement still be a meaningful one? If definite descriptions acted in the same ways as proper names, then this false expression would be devoid of meaning. The solution to this is that it is not necessary for definite descriptions to refer because they are not referential expressions, and so it would not matter if the statement in question was empty. For Russell, “The present king of France is bald” is a propositional function that states, there exists only one unique object which is the present king of France and that same object is bald. The expression “The F is G” contains the quantifying expressions of existence “Ǝ” and uniqueness “Ǝ!x (Fx and Gx)” An expression like the “The F is G” is still meaningful even if it fails to refer because it acts as an existential quantifier. What would happen with the negation of the form “The F is not G”; the truth value of this statement is dependent on whether the negation takes wide or narrow scope; for example, for the expression “The present king of France is bald”, the sentence is true if the negation takes wide scope whereas it affects the whole of the expression, “It is not the case that there is a king of France and that king of France is bald” (secondary occurrence); this is true because at the time of Russell writing this, there was indeed no present king of France. If the negation were to take narrow scape it would only affect the predicate and the expression would be, “The present king of France is not bald” (primary occurrence); this statement would be false because there is no present king of France in the first place, therefore the subject that the property of “baldness” is predicated upon does not exist. Because the expression’s truth content is tied to the scope of its negation, the meaning of existential quantifiers appears to him to be ambiguous.
2021-10-21 23:29:12 +0000 UTC View PostMy method for cock ratings: I developed a method for my cock ratings which judges by three sets of criterion on a 1-10 scale and takes two perspectives into account. I rate it by girth, length, and overall attractiveness from the “objective” framework which takes into account how that cock measures to the western cultural ideal of what makes a good cock and from the subjective point of view where I measure it according to my own personal preferences. What I prefer tends to be different than the cultural standard and I explain why this is in the video rating but people tend to leave happy with how I rate because I am honest and tend to sway more toward cocks on the smaller size. For example, if you have a average to smaller size cock, you would rate lower on the objective scale but higher in my personal scale, and the reverse is true in the case of bigger ones. My videos are 5 minutes long, I tend to start off the video describing the methodology, quickly defining the terms I use, the historical background of ideal cock size, and then delve into detailing where yours falls on a 1-10 scale. I explore the reasons why I prefer a certain size and will reassure you regardless of where you are on any of the scales that you have the capacity to pleasure a woman like me and that there are no reasons to feel insecure. An overview of my methodology is listed below: - Girth - Length — Objective / Subjective - Overall Attractiveness I can always say your name in the beginning of the video to reassure you that the rating is personalized. However, I hold my OF to a moral standard of utmost honesty and integrity and would never even consider deceiving subscribers with pre-made videos. I can however do SPH or Fem Dom versions of my cock ratings for the same price, but you won’t get the honesty of my real ratings. I can masturbate and cum while saying your name and what I want to do to your cock for $50 plus tax. You won’t get the honesty out of the real ratings for these either.
2021-10-21 13:05:49 +0000 UTC View Post
Thank you for understanding everyone. Had a good day at work, explaining Xeno’s paradox and different sizes of infinity to a 6 y r old. I can make another text post sometime explaining these concepts. Next I’ll work on teaching him how to program the Fibonacci sequence and recursion. 😂 He may actually enjoy learning about the Fibonacci sequence seeing that his favorite game is doubling large numbers. I’m the type of person who I wants to make every moment a teachable one, to help them develop a level of curiosity that drives been to explore difficult concepts like these. 🌟 On what it means being a “mommy dom” is to me: I am a switch but I act as a Mommy Dom to some men (most typically younger). I am naturally more maternal, but what tends to be the case is either I’m more experienced in the ways of the world or I’m just smarter — either way the domme role does stem from an assumption of superiority in one respect or both. It’s not a know-it-all superiority that desires to show off or make the other feel stupid, but just an underlying assumption that is made, which lends authority to what I have to say and the advice I give. My goals are only to improve the lives of men who cannot improve it themselves by offering motherly guidance and wisdom. It’s not like these other “dommes” who tells the guy they’re worthless or that they’re better than them in every way. I just claim superiority in certain matters and I desire to use this “superior” knowledge to help others. I don’t like how these “fin-dom”s go about it; the superiority they claim to hold over the man has no real source outside of her saying so. There’s no aftercare which I believe is an important part of the dynamic and distinguishes it from a straight up abusive relationship. 🌟 What are your guys thoughts on this?
2021-10-20 23:29:13 +0000 UTC View Post
This is an old side project a friend and I was working on together for fun. Included are screenshots from our website and below is a description of our subscription model. Unfortunately my current offer is only available to residents current living in the US due to shipping costs: 📚 For $50, I can choose 5-6 books for you, personally curated from my massive library. For me to best select a book, I’d like to know the following information about you: a short list of your favorite books of all time, a list of your various interests, what aspects of a book do you find most engaging, and whatever you feel will tell me what you think I need to know in the selection process. 🌟 In my first semester of graduate school, a colleague (a mathematics graduate student) and I started a project called >Title Here<. It was intended to be a specialized curation service with the basic subscription model (similar to Book of the Month Club) dedicated to philosophy and mathematics texts. The idea began with a couple of friends asking me to recommend a philosophy book or a secondary source that can supplement their understanding of a primary philosophical text. This is, of course, a task I gladly avail myself to. My thought process when choosing a book starts with their philosophical background -- this isn’t necessarily about their academic knowledge but a general assessment of their personality in terms of what interests them and their goals. People come to philosophy for a variety of reasons, whether it be for personal enrichment or as an extension to their academic studies in another field. I feel my book selections are unique because it does not shy away from subjects that are interdisciplinary and tries to choose texts that are not as well known by the public. The purpose of this is to encourage the reader to understand and interpret the text in multiple frameworks and to resuscitate “hidden gems” from obscurity (many philosophers are lesser-known because their work has not been translated to English or are unfortunately overshadowed by some of the bigger names). For those who are new to philosophy, there may be some trepidation in knowing what topics they want to start with or what is of interest to them. There is also a misconception about philosophy and its relevance to the average person: philosophy is misconceived as a field that has lost its relevance in the modern world. The questions it poses are either unanswerable (therefore pointless to ask in the first place) or have already been answered by the illusion of objectivity reminiscent of 18th Century Enlightenment mentality (I am referring to the pitfalls of Scientism such as having pretensions to absolute Truth and what I would call unrelenting “faith” in something that is fallible and subject to revision rather than any disbelief in the scientific method or its results on my end). With this project, we hoped to augment the book discovery process with a curated book delivery service. Conversations are the natural place where debaters and intellectuals express their interests. Our process was to engage our members in discussions centered on the philosophical sciences, table our chats, and use these insights into member interests to mail them engaging works of literature or philosophy. When readers visit a bookstore it is often the books one should read that win out. It offered a unique way to find books by basing book recommendations off conversations with its members. I thought this approach would lead to new and diverse book selections. It was noted that my expertise is in the philosophical sciences, and all the books were purchased second hand to keep costs low. In the second photo is an example of the chat service we designed that allows us to get to know more about the customer’s tastes and preferences in order to make the perfect match. When we have found a book a member would enjoy based on our conversations we mailed it to them, at a flat rate. They chose the number of books per year they would like to receive. Our books were top-quality second-hand finds, discovered, and delivered from New York City. We delivered second hand books to minimize member costs, not to deliver low-quality books. With unique access to second-hand retailers we were able to deliver near new books at a fraction of the cost.
2021-10-20 20:02:23 +0000 UTC View Post
Just in case you needed to see my OP titties today 🌟 How much talking do you like in videos? ❤️ Who’s your favorite philosopher? Feel free to message me your response or comment below! 🔥 My favorite philosopher to read is Kant. I find him incredibly fascinating in his personal life and philosophy. His views on mathematics, although completely wrong, was still very influential to the philosophy of maths. I also like how he dedicated himself Intellectually to almost every facet of life from the meaning of history to morality. Even when rebuked by royal decree to cease writing on religion, he cleverly found a loophole & did it anyways. I enjoy reading him because his style of argumentation is very systematic, in a way that allows the reader to rationally follow his line of reasoning to its conclusion fairly easily.
2021-10-19 21:10:25 +0000 UTC View Post
🔥 Fundraiser: Tip to help get me a lovense sex toy so you can control it for me 😉 Which one (or ones*) should I look into? (Highest tipper gets a free video of me using the toy and I will say their name as I cum) A story about how I received a Four Loko from a stranger and learned the meaning of life. #truestory #honesttogod 💕 What are your favorite videogames? Which games did you grow up playing? Who do you play on Melee? Who do you play as on Civ V or Civ VI? I got my new laptop finally! Woo! I am going to try to find a good consistent time to stream. I have to figure out what my schedule will be like for my day job since I will be working with an additional client, who I will be meeting alongside his parents later today. I want to stream on Twitch as well. I only did that once so far. Images included in post: me who plays Civ VI without disasters lol and my photography — Persian New Year set up, guy davening (praying) at a Shul in LA, and the shul that literally is a Karate studio (it’s called Happy Minyan).
2021-10-19 18:09:16 +0000 UTC View Post
💕 Please like my posts too, as well as answer the poll. It shows me I’m loved and appreciated. ❤️ 🔥 Tip to help me make more content that you all enjoy and get off to. 😘. 😇 If you enjoy my page, write a positive review endorsing me on one of the Onlyfans Review Subreddits. It’s against the rules to provide incentives for it but it’s very much appreciated! 🌟 What is the ideal length for a fucking or blowjob video? Clarify in comments if they’re different. Both the Enlightenment and Romanticism took part in the destruction of nature , the former utilizing it as a method in their attempt to claim monopoly on all that is natural, the latter, too, reduces it to a petrified image which places it at a distance, in which consequently, furthers the alienation of man and his origin (nature). Both , to some extent, posit nature as an external object that is readily apt for manipulation. The enlightenment’s denaturalization project is one which depicts man as physically exercising his will over nature through scientific investigation, but the Romantics, in their attempt in reviving nature and that of the sublime through the Aesthetic experience, they, too, propagated the acceleration of modernism by their imposing unto nature (through modern art), a fictional harmonious identity (of nature and its relation to man) by which man utilizes nature as an object and as a means to this object through the act of conceptually arresting the object which it is transposed to that of appropriation and is no longer the original object but that of man’s creation and the empty remainder of his “will to power”. Romanticism was a movement, emerging out of a period of what I would refer to as, disillusioned empowerment; it was a transition from The Age of Enlightenment, known for its abundance of scientific advancements, its rejection of authority, and any faith based system that is not apt for empirical study. I called the Enlightenment “disillusioned empowerment” because this movement represents what I believe Goethe portrayed through the character of Faust. Faust desired to gain Absolute Knowledge , which too, mirrors the Enlightenment’s attitude of substituting its faith from the church into itself whereas progress was to be achieved through the reliable use of human reason and its negation of the metaphysical phenomena outside of empirical experience. A lot of what seemed to be at the time, incomprehensible, was at once, elucidated which included a wide ranging amount of discoveries extending from the chemical compounds that make up water to the proof of a heliocentric universe. In this sense, the mysteries of the universe began to be illuminated all at once; the light of human reason was the indispensable force in unveiling a future where knowledge is readily accessible by which man was able to transcend his finite limitations and potentially become god. Amidst the innumerable discoveries made during the Enlightenment, it appeared as if the objects and external noumena that was once inexplicable and attributed to a higher power, can now be reduced to a mathematical formula. The world began to open itself up as that which could be known and it was through man’s faith in human reason, that this was to be accomplished. Goethe’s rejection of the values held by the Enlightenment was depicted through the created framework by which the characters and plot are structured and confined within a self-contained system as designated by God and his natural processes. Faust’s pact with Mephistopheles represented man’s disavowal of nature whereas man is seen to be impinging upon these purported boundaries in his attempt to take immediate possession of all that is unknown and not yet subject to his speculation. This act of hubris is an active rejection of God's intended will for the world and mirrors that of the ungrateful c h I l l d who is given what is necessary by his or her well-intended parents, but continues to beg for more; similar to the petulance of a c h I l l d, man is never satisfied because the gap in which situates the unknown, will continue to exponentially widen at a faster rate than the confirmed certainty in which man is in perpetual pursuit of. Man’s intended position is that of subservience to the natural order (as willed by god) ; this insatiable conquest of knowledge by inorganic means characterizes what Romanticism feared to be man’s eventual destruction of the natural world in his pursuit of gaining mastery over it. They seeked to suspend the process of "modernization" by initiating the call to innocence, the return to a primitive earth not yet besmirched by man. The Romantic movement isn't a passing presence that shed it's imprint once upon history and fades only into a relic , both treasured and sustained by the fragmented interests of time; when referring to Romanticism , it's important to elaborate upon its unique and distinguishing features that reflect, not only its historical and aesthetic context, but the ways in which these features are a representation of the undergoing conflict between itself and its determination. Romanticism is entirely spiritual and religious in its essence; being a direct witness to what they felt, may have been, an injustice or an affront to the creator, they harbored the guilt of its previous generations' physical and metaphorical demolition of nature, in which, through their art, they believed the relationship between nature and man was to be reconciled. Art became almost an Utopia, in the sense that it was capable of exercising its existence in realms outside of that which was irreconcilable in reality; Frankenstein, undertook the divine role of creation upon himself and it was through this “conquest of death” that the Romantics , too, became a victim to its production of a monster with potential of destroying its creator.
2021-10-19 16:05:35 +0000 UTC View Post
🌟 What Sexual Content would you like to see me do: What are your thoughts on the quotations below? « The reason why people can actually do so little with their free time is that the truncation of their imagination deprives them of the faculty which made the state of freedom pleasurable in the first place. People have been refused freedom, and its value belittled, for such a long time that now people no longer like it. They need the shallow entertainment, by means of which cultural conservatism patronizes and humiliates them, in order to summon up the strength for work, which is required of them under the arrangement of society which cultural conservatism defends. This is one good reason why people have remained chained to their work, and to a system which trains them for work, long after that system has ceased to require their labour. » Adorno, The Culture Industry “Pleasure always means not to think about anything, to forget suffering even where it is shown. Basically it is helplessness. It is flight; not, as is asserted, flight from a wretched reality, but from the last remaining thought of resistance.” — Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments « Works of art are ascetic and shameless; the culture industry is pornographic and prudish. It reduces love to romance... The mass production of sexuality automatically brings about its repression. » —The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception, Adorno and Horkheimer Entertainment is the prolongation of work under late capitalism. It is sought by those who want to escape the mechanized labor process so that they can cope with it again. — Dialectics of Enlightenment
2021-10-18 21:05:38 +0000 UTC View Post
Self portrait and other miscellaneous content 💕 🌟 What non-sexual activity would you be most interested in seeing?
2021-10-18 18:32:25 +0000 UTC View Post
As I previously said before, polls help me learn more about your desires and what you want to see. Tell me all about your weird sexual fantasies and fetishes, we can trace together the origins of it in discussion if you’d like. I hold no judgement regarding what you’re into, as long as you’re not perpetuating harm against u n w I l l I n g participants. I am here to provide a place where you can explore those weird sexy thoughts and see where it takes you. 💕 🌟 What kinks would you like to see more of? Feel free to explicate further in the comment section below. (I forgot to put interracial so if you want that, just click race play and I’ll know what it means) 🔥 Likes and Tips are appreciated! 🥰 🌹 Nude Video Cock Ratings for $20 / Tip 20 and send a picture, and I’ll get to it when I can. ❤️
2021-10-18 01:25:49 +0000 UTC View Post
From my TikTok. Feel free to follow. 💕 Photos are taken by me of Lake Bled, Slovenia Another poll for you all! I want to learn more about what you all like in order to produce content accordingly. In this case, I’m more than happy to cater to the male gaze. 😘 🌟 Would you like me to share more about my experiences with darker topics such as r a p e, trauma, and the like? I’ve actively worked through all this in therapy and am now in a place where my trauma doesn’t have the same emotional hold as it did in my y o u n g e r y e a r s. The traumatic events that troubled my t e e n a g e y e a r s had a big impact in defining the person I’ve become and I can’t say I’m upset by that. Feel free to share with me your own experiences with the above mentioned topics (or any topic for that matter.) In my relatively short number of existence, I’ve accumulated a lot of weird life experiences and can relate to many on a number of them. If I don’t have experience on a given topic, I will openly say so instead of pretending in order to appear “relatable”. 💕 🥰 Like my posts please if you can! Much appreciated!
2021-10-17 22:52:41 +0000 UTC View Post
More causal pictures with bits and pieces of my life: notes from college, books, and my anime figure. 🥰 🌟 Thinking about non-existent objects: If a nonexistent object is an object that does not exist, then the existence of the concept itself must presuppose it exists. The problem of non-existent objects appears trivial on the face of it, but its implications are expensive and its concerns extend deep into formal logic and the philosophy of language. My favorite example of a non-existent object is the unicorn. A unicorn has the characteristics of looking like a horse and having a horn on its forehead. How is it we are able to attribute properties to an object that does not have the existence to instantiate them? Are there ontic commitments that must be made in order to uphold this far reaching ontology of non-existent objects? The philosopher that is known for his philosophy of non-existent objects is Meinong, who says that non-existent objects such as the round square or the golden mountain don’t exist but subsist. The proposition “the golden mountain exists” is false and “the golden mountain does not exist” is true, but how can the latter proposition be true if the negative existential quantifier is quantified over a non-existent object? Or maybe that’s what we get for disobeying Kant and making existence a predicate.
2021-10-17 18:08:19 +0000 UTC View Post
Some regular photos with my kitten Kira and other fun stuff! I have another poll for you guys so I can continue to deliver more of what you like: 🌟 What type of BG content would you like to see a lot more of? Which do you like the best?
2021-10-17 12:14:11 +0000 UTC View Post
Some regular pictures of me. 💕 ❤️ Will be sending out a special video for all those who set their rebilling feature on tomorrow hopefully! A couple questions for you all: 🌟Do you think online dating will ever be “fair” for men or should we just accept that men are inherently disadvantaged in that particular area of life? 🌟 What changes do you think society can make that would improve the life of men? 🌟 Do you think women’s lives are easier and why? 💞 Please message me if you’re struggling financially and I will do my best to help!
2021-10-16 21:30:35 +0000 UTC View PostTikTok — katarii000 I was having too much fun with this last night. 🥺💕
2021-10-16 18:05:06 +0000 UTC View PostMy old laptop died and I just got a new one. Plus, side for you guys, i’m going to start doing regular streams! As always, I am open to working with other experienced content creators. 🌟 Upcoming: - GG video (already filmed, just waiting on the editing) - BBG (watch me suck cock while getting fucked 😉) - Hysterical Literature - Audio Content (Feel free to send scripts) - More JOI videos from yours truly - Role play and sexy costumes - And more 🔥 Recommendations are appreciated. 😚 🌻 Subscribers who have their rebilling on gets exclusive content. If you didn’t receive the most recent video and turned on your rebilling feature, let me know and I’ll send it to you. 😇 It takes a lot of work and resources to be as responsive as I am, to invest in better equipment, and provide new services. In order to maintain the quality interactions and higher resolution content, and bring newer better content, i’m planning to increase subscription price by $2 a month. I hope you understand! I try to provide a more personal experience on my OF, getting to know you all as individuals rather than as just “customers” shrouded in anonymity. In my OF model, I will always prioritize engagement and interaction with my subscribers. I will never in the future sell PPV. All my content is freely available to subscribers. Never feel obligated to tip in exchange for conversation. I enjoy these long-winded discussions. My inbox is always open to subscribers whether it be an emotional crisis, a customs request, or anything really. Just know non-judgmental caring soul is here for you ❤️ I want to ensure those who have supported me are taken care of so if at this time you're struggling financially reach out to me and we can discuss further. 💕
2021-10-16 17:09:03 +0000 UTC View Post
Send $20 and a picture of your cock, and I’ll rate it. I feel like doing some ratings. 💕 — This is the theory regarding my experiences of staring at a random stranger , whether on the street or in a cafe, for six intense seconds, and then completely ignore them altogether. Foucault talked of power being productive. Repression creates a whole series of ways in which sexuality then becomes specialized. Because sexuality was so overly defined during the Victorian era, all-non-normative expression of sexuality became highlighted. In this particular sense, Foucault rejects the notion of liberating sexuality as such is a discourse and not a concrete force which is enslaved or repressed. Therefore, my stares are a classic example of how sexuality finds forms of expression, not despite repression but because of it. Stares don’t become sexualized unless repression is present. Otherwise, they would usimply be stares.
2021-10-15 20:59:30 +0000 UTC View Post
Some slice of life 🥰 — Psychoanalysis as a work of transformation When pressed to explain the process undergone in psychoanalysis, it will always be subject to sounding invariably trite and is most often reduced to that of a patient "ranting" in which the case being, shouldn't talking be free? Why can't this analytic process be done in the privacy of my own home or is it possible I can simply conduct this inner monologue to a close friend who remains silent for the purpose of achieving the same analytic effect? The question is what distinguishes psychoanalysis from any other form of therapy if it appears to be simply "talking". Psychoanalysis endows words with transformative properties in which there is no individual part of this process that can be pinpointed in its potential success because this process remains in that stage of what Walter Benjamin calls, "the dialectical image" in which refers to the shared interaction between the viewer (subject who perceives which in this case is me) and the moment (the past interpreted by the subject through the act of recalling these memories) in which in its preservation , can return one back to a recurring point. No word or moment within a single session can be attributed to the transformation of one's self. From my brief personal experience with psychoanalysis, the reason there are no predetermined goals is because that would confine the patient to the trivial mindset of "cause and effect"; this means that the purpose of analysis is open-ended indicating that this process is not procedural. By there being no systematic set of instructions that must be followed allows the patient and the process of her analysis to not be restrained from the plethora of possibilities. There are no pre-established goals because psychoanalysis, like life, is open ended; this is similar to what makes life interesting compared to that of a movie being repeatedly rewatched, is not only that it's mysterious but that it's subject to change at any time. Psychoanalysis emphasizes in this way that a person's circumstances and momentary desires are transient but what is truly significant is the character development which Freud relates to being caused by the "education to reality" (psychoanalysis) in which the patient no longer feels as if her reality is permanent and she will forever be constituted for but by undergoing analysis, she , too, has her own ability to freely constitute. If you want to understand a systematic process of how psychoanalysis works (although this does not do it justice but it will for now suffice). The nature of the u n c o n s c I o u s is that it is not visible to that of the senses which also reaffirms that the elements involved in this process, is too, elusive and cannot be detected by physical means. The Analyst is only able to make and test deductions based on the recognized patterns the patient exhibits in his daily interactions in the analytic setting. The analyst and the process of psychoanalysis itself, being an inherently neutral force, aids in the transposition of the patent's u n c o n s c I o u s thoughts (repressed by trauma or sublimated elsewhere) into that of conscious thoughts (pre-conscious). Although, as I have stated previously, the u n c o n s c I o u s not being directly accessible but we are able to view pieces of the u n c o n s c I o u s through the process of conscious thoughts being transformed into that of the patient's dreams. If I were to pin point an objective goals that Psychoanalysis undertakes, the first being , the patient's regain of ego control , and second , most importantly, is that the patient is , thus, given the much deserved possibility to live a happy and fulfilling life without being relentlessly tormented by the plethora of pathologies that stem from being alienated from their own identity as a freely constituting self.
2021-10-15 18:11:04 +0000 UTC View Post
I’m bringing back the tip wheel! I’m very close to raising enough to buy my laptop, so I can stream with you guys. 🥰 $12 for one spin $22 for two spins $30 for three spins I will send you a video recording I take of the spin and what you land on.
2021-10-15 15:42:52 +0000 UTC View Post
Like me as a blonde? Sorry for all the polls but I like to better understand my subscriber base: Please check which racial category you most identify with. Yes, I did not include Jews as White because I want to specifically know how many of my subscribers are Jewish. 🌟 Making BG content today! What are your favorite positions to see on video and what is the ideal video length? What type of dialogue if any do you like to hear? How much raceplay would you like to see incorporated? 🔥 Tip if you want to see my face pushed into the mattress, being fucked relentlessly from behind. 😉 — On the formation of pathologies and Nabokov's Lo l i t a I was reflecting on the qualities I seek in people I date, and what those qualities produce in me. From my perspective, pathologies in adulthood stem from pre-mature emotions (this term is used in a broad sense and can indicate any form of internal expression) or something of that sort, that is left inconclusive or that have been abruptly cut off by an external factor out of one's control. The fact that it being out of their control, leads a person to feeling powerless or a victim in the face of an Other that is elusive, in nature; therefore because it came from a place that is undefinable, it is difficult to know to whom this emotion should be directed. That being said, these emotions do not simply disappear altogether after the source is suddenly cut short, but a form of sublimation occurs in which it is then redirected elsewhere. In Vladimir Nabokov's Lo l i t a, Humbert reminisces from his prison cell his childhood infatuation that was never truly resolved; it being inconclusive, led him to be consumed by an anxiety-ridden fantasy in which there was an incessant replay of the potential. He has, thus, internalized an image, and impressed permanence upon this transient image. This application of immortalizing an image dissolves any possibility of fulfillment or any form of satisfaction because the object in which this affection is directed will always be imperfect and lacking; this gap that separates Humbert from this love will remain insatiably empty. He can continue to try to fill this void with imitations or projections of this original emotion, but because he is partaking in an activity of enacting permanence on something that is temporal, it will always be embodied in some form which , too, is subject to decay. This type of sadness is best exemplified in William Blake's poem "The Angel" in which there is a pervading sense of guilt felt by he who has rejected the innocence of youth; Humbert transforms this loss into that of possession whereas Humbert's former love was viewed as something that was unjustly taken from him. It is through Lo l i t a, Humbert attempts to physically materialize this image and finally reclaim possession over that which has been stolen. In result, he is driven into an interminable cycle of madness in order to recreate an eternal form of perfection in a world in which it does not exist. Although, the girl named Dolores Haze will inevitably age, the power Nabokov allotted the imagination affirms Lo l i t a will eternally exist so long its memory is sustained by Humbert. It was from this perspective, that I started to reflect upon my own feelings about love. To start from the question of qualities and traits I seek in a partner and what those qualities produce in me, my first overt observation being that I tend to date older men which is not simply for the reason that I may have "daddy issues" but it causes me to re-enter that former state of innocence and naivety that I was f o r c e d to quickly grow out. In this attempt to retrieve and recover what was tragically taken from me, I divorced my self from the father figure by instead, indirectly dictating this role on those I date. Through each relationship, essentially I was constantly recreating a desired image of a father figure.
2021-10-15 11:32:28 +0000 UTC View Post
